Skip Navigation Links weather.gov 
NOAA logo - Click to go to the NOAA homepage National Weather Service   NWS logo - Click to go to the NWS homepage
The Weather Prediction Center

 
 

 

Follow the Weather Prediction Center on Facebook
WPC on Facebook
NCEP Quarterly Newsletter
WPC Home
Analyses and Forecasts
   National High & Low
   WPC Discussions
   Surface Analysis
   Days ½-2½ CONUS
   Days 3-7 CONUS
   Days 4-8 Alaska
   QPF
   PQPF
   Flood Outlook
   Winter Weather
   Storm Summaries
   Heat Index
   Air Quality
   Tropical Products
   Daily Weather Map
   GIS Products
Current Watches/
Warnings

Satellite and Radar Imagery
   Satellite Images
   National Radar
Verification
   WPC Verification
   NPVU
   Model Diagnostics
   Event Reviews
International Desks
Development and Training
   Development
WPC Overview
   About the WPC
   Staff
   WPC History
   Accomplishments
   Other Sites
   FAQs
Meteorological Calculators
Contact Us
   About Our Site
 
USA.gov is the U.S. Government's official web portal to all federal, state, and local government web resources and services.
 
Model Diagnostics Discussion
 
(Caution: Version displayed is not the latest version. - Issued 0447Z May 21, 2013)
 
Version Selection
Versions back from latest:  0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   
 
Abbreviations and acronyms used in this product
 
Geographic Boundaries -  Map 1: Color  Black/White       Map 2: Color  Black/White


MODEL DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION
NWS WEATHER PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD
1247 AM EDT TUE MAY 21 2013

VALID MAY 21/0000 UTC THRU MAY 24/1200 UTC

...SEE NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) FOR THE STATUS OF THE UPPER AIR
INGEST...


00Z NAM/GFS EVALUATION WITH PRELIMINARY MODEL PREFERENCES
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NAM/GFS INITIALIZATION ERRORS DO NOT SEEM TO DEGRADE THEIR SHORT
RANGE FORECASTS.


DEEP CYCLONE MOVING INTO THE NORTHWEST
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PREFERENCE:  NON-NAM COMPROMISE
CONFIDENCE:  ABOVE AVERAGE

OUTSIDE THE SLOW/MORE WESTWARD 00Z NAM, THE GUIDANCE SHOWS
EXCELLENT AGREEMENT WITH THIS SYSTEM'S PROGRESSION.  USING THE
NAM'S LONG-STANDING SLOW BIAS WITH SYSTEMS PROGRESSING THROUGH THE
WESTERLIES AS A GUIDE, PREFER A NON-NAM COMPROMISE HERE WITH ABOVE
AVERAGE CONFIDENCE CONSIDERING ITS SLOW MOVEMENT AND AMPLIFIED
NATURE.  THE 21Z SREF MEAN SHOULD BE OF SOME UTILITY IN THIS
REGION.


SYSTEM MOVING ACROSS THE MIDWEST AND EAST
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PREFERENCE:  12Z ECMWF/12Z UKMET/12Z CANADIAN
CONFIDENCE:  AVERAGE

THE 00Z NAM/00Z GFS/18Z GEFS MEAN ARE SLOWER AND SHARPER WITH THIS
SYSTEM AS IT MOVES THROUGH THE OHIO VALLEY INTO THE EAST.  THE
FLOW PATTERN IT IS EMBEDDED WITHIN FEATURES A BROAD UPPER/POLAR
VORTEX ACROSS EASTERN CANADA WITH A BROAD RIDGING ACROSS THE
CENTRAL PLAINS.  BOTH THESE FEATURES WOULD FAVOR A BROADER AND
MORE PROGRESSIVE SYSTEM THAN ADVERTISED BY THE NAM/GFS SOLUTIONS. 
THE LONG-RUNNING NAM SLOW BIAS ALSO ARGUES FOR A SOLUTION QUICKER
THAN THE NAM.  THE MODEL PREFERENCE IS FOR A 12Z ECMWF/12Z
UKMET/12Z CANADIAN WITH AVERAGE CONFIDENCE DUE TO ITS PROGRESSIVE
AND DEAMPLIFYING NATURE.  THE 21Z SREF MEAN SHOULD BE OF SOME
UTILITY WITH THIS SYSTEM.


UPPER TROUGH OVER FLORIDA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PREFERENCE:  00Z GFS
CONFIDENCE:  ABOVE AVERAGE

THE 12Z UKMET/21Z SREF MEAN ARE THE WEAKEST WITH THIS SYSTEM'S
DEPICTION WHILE THE 00Z NAM IS THE STRONGEST.  MODEL BIAS OF THE
ECMWF WHICH USUALLY CAUSE WEAKER MID-LEVEL SYSTEMS TO BE FORECAST
AS TOO WEAK AND OF THE NAM WHICH NORMALLY DEPICTS MID-LEVEL
SYSTEMS TOO STRONGLY ARGUE FOR A SOLUTION IN BETWEEN THE
TWO...CLOSEST TO THE 00Z GFS.  THE 00Z GFS IS PREFERRED WITH ABOVE
AVERAGE CONFIDENCE CONSIDERING ITS VERY SLOW PROGRESSION.


...MODEL TREND GRAPHICS AT www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/model2.shtml

ROTH